Browsing by Author "Alkan, Nail"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Inogate projesi çerçevesinde AB-Güney Kafkas ülkeleri ilişkileri(Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2004) Alkan, Nail20. Yüzyılın vazgeçilmez doğal kaynağı olan petrol ve doğalgazın önümüzdeki yüzyılda da yaşamın tüm alanlarında egemenliğini koruyacağı kuşku götürmemektedir. Bu nedenle bu kaynaklara gerçek anlamda sahip olan ülkelerin uluslar arası arenada önemli oranda ağırlıklarının olacağı da kesindir. Bu düşünceden yola çıkan AB ülkeleri enerji arzının çeşitlendirilmesi, sürdürülebilir ekonomik gelişmenin ve enerji güvenliğinin sağlanması amacıyla 1990’lı yılların ortalarından başlayarak Hazar Denizinin doğal kaynaklarıyla ilgilenmeye başlamışlardır. Her ne kadar bu konuda ABD’nin gerisinde kalsalar da AB bu kaynaklardan kendi çıkarları doğrultusunda yararlanmaya, kendi ekonomik gelişmesini Hazar bölgesinin doğal kaynaklarıyla beslemeye çalışmaktadır. İşte bu amaçla 1994-95 yıllarında yürürlüğe konan INOGATE projesi günümüzde AB-Güney Kafkas ülkeleri ilişkilerinin temel taşlarından biri olarak sayılmaktadır. Tezin amacı da bu önemli projenin tarihsel gelişimini, yapısını ve proje kapsamında AB-Güney Kafkas ülkeleri arasındaki ilişkilerin değerlendirilmesidir. Tezin birinci bölümünde Güney Kafkas ülkelerinin kısa tarihçesi, ekonomik ve siyasi yapıları, AB ile olan ilişkileri, ikinci bölümünde INOGATE projesinin gelişimi, kurumsal yapısı ve bu proje çerçevesinde AB-Güney Kafkas ülkeleri ilişkileri incelenecektir. Son bölüm olan üçüncü bölümdeyse Kafkasya’da süren uluslararası rekabet ve INOGATE projesinin AB ve Güney Kafkas ülkeleri için getireceği avantajlar ele alınmıştır.Item Sovyetler Birliği'nin dağılmasından sonra Kazakistan ile Almanya ilişkileri(Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2003) Amzayev, Ruslan; Alkan, Nail; Uluslararası İlişkilerABSTRACT Ruslan, Amzayev, The Reletions Between Kazakhstan and Germany After Desintegration of the USSR, Master's Thesis, Advisor: Yrd.Doc.Dr.Nail Alkan, 94p. The relationships between Germany and Kazakhstan have begun with the acquirement of independence by Kazakhstan in 1991 and continues until today. Although the historical process of these relationships are short, both countries have taken very important steps to develop and strengthen the ties between themselves. The Parties have managed to establish the legal basis of the bilateral relationships with several agreements signed in various areas. But unfortunately, it is a reality that there is insufficiency in ithe implementation of some of these agreements in practice. This condition affects the development of the relationships between the countries negatively. Both Germany and Kazakhstan accept that they have not been able to use the potentials they have in their hand for the development of the relationships between the two countries completely. Despite this it is noticed that the development rate of the relationships between these two countries has been increasing in the last 5 years. The reciprocal visits at high levels also positively affect the bilateral relationships. Both countries show great interest and importance to each other. Germany, which plays a mediator role between Europe and Kazakhstan, considers Kazakhstan playing an important role in its benefits in Central Asia. Another element which gives speciality to the relationships between Germany and Kazakhstan is the approximately 300,000 German minority living in Kazakhstan. This minority is playing like a "tie bridge" role between these two countries. Unfortunately, Germans living in Kazakhstan leave Kazakhstan and settle in Germany. Both countries do not want the migration of the German minority and try to make a suitable environment for Germans to stay in Kazakhstan. Although the Kazakhstan-Germany relationships have not reached their full potentials, there seems to be no obstacle for the development oftthese relationships in the future.Item Terörizm ve uluslararası yönü(Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2001) Seyrek, Nihat; Alkan, Nail; Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu YönetimiSUMMARY Terrorism doesn't have a certain definition to convince everybody. Besides being a complex fact that may cause different approaches in different cases or being open to include value judgement, "using violence" that is not detachable from terrorism deepen the disagreement in the common definition. In addition to this, terrorism, may be defined as; achieving illegal strategic and political aims by frightening an innocence society using violence or threat of violence by an organization or a state. Terrorism, that involves more than one country or their citizens is called "international terrorism". Killing another country's diplomats, businessmen or directors, to skyjack planes by any terrorists is international terrorism. The main feature of international terrorism is terror organizations or countries giving support to terrorism having a political purpose mat is beyond their boundaries. It tends to reach political purposes and creating political changes. All these show that international terrorism is an act of violence that happens in the boundaries of a contry and infringe people's rights. In democratic countries, terrorism aims to destroy democracy. In order not to fall into the trap of terrorism, loyality to the principles of democracy is needed. Terrorism can only be defeated by public will 112Following years will possibly become "the era of super terror" in which terrorists will use more destructive powers. Future's most dangerous terrorists won't be politic ideologies but terrorists that act with ethnic and religious emotions. And for materializing their will, there will also be the choices of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. 113Item Yurtdışı İşçi Göçü Sorunları ve Çözüm Arayışları "Uluslararası Toplantı"(2002) Alkan, Nail; Küçükkaraca, Nilgün; Temiz, Turabi; Hermann, Edwin; Çiğner Cengiz, Elçin